🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.